μMicroeconomics LabGRAPHICAL EXPLORATIONSOffer Curve Lab ↗

EXPLORE · ADJUST · EXPLAIN

Price, profit, and the cost of market power

Find the monopolist’s global optimum and compare it with the welfare-maximizing quantity.

Demand & technology

Returns in variable production
ρ > 1 makes MC rise; ρ < 1 makes MC fall. The firm can stay closed and avoid F. Closing gives zero output and zero profit.

Monopoly and the efficient benchmark

P(q) = 100 − 1q · C(q) = 20 + 10q^1

Axes stay fixed as parameters change.
Demand, marginal revenue, marginal cost, profit, consumer surplus and deadweight loss002424484872729696120120MonopolyMR = MCEfficientQuantity · qPrice / cost per unit
DemandMRMCProfit · green areaCS · blue areaDWL · orange area
Monopoly output45
Monopoly price55
Profit2,005
Consumer surplus1,012.5
Deadweight loss1,012.5
Efficient output90

Work out the optimum

1 · Marginal revenue meets marginal cost

Positive-output candidate: MR = MC
π(q)=(ABq)qcqρF,q>0MR(q)=A2BqMC(q)=cρqρ1A2Bq=cρqρ1\begin{aligned}\pi(q)&=(A-Bq)q-cq^\rho-F,\quad q>0\\ \mathrm{MR}(q)&=A-2Bq\\ \mathrm{MC}(q)&=c\rho q^{\rho-1}\\ A-2Bq&=c\rho q^{\rho-1}\end{aligned}

Choose the best positive candidate, then compare with π(0) = 0. For ρ ≠ 1 the displayed root is computed numerically; the equations remain exact.

Compare candidate profit with closure
qcandidate=45qm=45pm=1001(45)=55ATC(qm)=10.4444\begin{aligned}q_{\mathrm{candidate}}&=45\\ q_m&=45\\ p_m&=100-1(45)\\&=55\\\mathrm{ATC}(q_m)&=10.4444\end{aligned}

2 · Calculate the areas

Profit and consumer surplus
πm=[pmATC(qm)]qm=2,005CSm=12(Apm)qm=1,012.5Wm=CSm+πm=3,017.5\begin{aligned}\pi_m&=[p_m-\mathrm{ATC}(q_m)]q_m=2,005\\ \mathrm{CS}_m&=\frac12(A-p_m)q_m=1,012.5\\ W_m&=\mathrm{CS}_m+\pi_m=3,017.5\end{aligned}

These operating formulas apply when qₘ > 0. At closure all three values are zero.

3 · Efficient benchmark

Efficient surplus less monopoly surplus
W(q)=AqBq22cqρFWe=max ⁣{0,maxq>0W(q)}P(qe)=MC(qe)at an operating optimumWe=4,030DWL=WeWm=1,012.5\begin{aligned}W(q)&=Aq-\frac{Bq^2}{2}-cq^\rho-F\\W_e&=\max\!\left\{0,\max_{q>0}W(q)\right\}\\ P(q_e)&=\mathrm{MC}(q_e)\quad\text{at an operating optimum}\\ W_e&=4,030\\ \mathrm{DWL}&=W_e-W_m=1,012.5\end{aligned}

With increasing returns, marginal-cost pricing may not cover total cost. This is a welfare benchmark, not necessarily a sustainable competitive equilibrium.

What “returns to scale” means here

With one variable input z at unit price 1 and technology q = (z/c)1/ρ, producing q requires z = cqρ. Thus ρ > 1 means decreasing returns in variable production, ρ = 1 constant returns, and ρ < 1 increasing returns. The separate fixed overhead F also lowers average cost as it is spread over more units.

Overhead is avoidable when the firm stays closed
C(q)={0,q=0,F+cqρ,q>0,MC(q)=10q0ATC(q)=20q+10q0,q>0\begin{aligned}C(q)&=\begin{cases}0,&q=0,\\F+cq^\rho,&q>0,\end{cases}\\ \mathrm{MC}(q)&=10q^{0}\\ \mathrm{ATC}(q)&=\frac{20}q+10q^{0},\quad q>0\end{aligned}

When both allocations operate, fixed cost cancels from the welfare comparison: DWL = A(qₑ−qₘ) − ½B(qₑ²−qₘ²) − c(qₑρ−qₘρ).